
鸿蒙多设备数据同步一致性测试方案设计与实现 原创
鸿蒙多设备数据同步一致性测试方案设计与实现
一、测试框架设计
1.1 整体架构
基于《鸿蒙跨端U同步》中游戏场景的同步机制,我们设计了一套多设备数据同步测试框架:
graph TD
A[测试控制端] -->发送测试指令
B[设备集群]
–>返回状态数据
C[一致性验证引擎]
–> D[生成测试报告]
–>同步状态
E[分布式数据总线]
1.2 核心测试指标
数据最终一致性:所有设备数据是否在合理时间内达成一致
同步延迟:数据变更到所有设备同步完成的时间差
冲突处理正确性:并发修改时的冲突解决策略有效性
断网恢复能力:网络中断后重新连接的数据恢复机制
二、基础同步模块实现
2.1 分布式数据管理(参考游戏玩家数据同步)
// DistributedDataManager.ets
import distributedData from ‘@ohos.data.distributedData’;
class DistributedDataManager {
private static instance: DistributedDataManager;
private kvManager: distributedData.KVManager;
private kvStore: distributedData.KVStore;
static getInstance(): DistributedDataManager {
if (!DistributedDataManager.instance) {
DistributedDataManager.instance = new DistributedDataManager();
return DistributedDataManager.instance;
private constructor() {
this.initKVStore();
private async initKVStore() {
const config = {
bundleName: 'com.example.synctest',
userInfo: {
userId: 'testUser',
userType: distributedData.UserType.SAME_USER_ID
};
this.kvManager = distributedData.createKVManager(config);
const options = {
createIfMissing: true,
encrypt: false,
backup: false,
autoSync: true,
kvStoreType: distributedData.KVStoreType.SINGLE_VERSION,
// 性能优化参数
syncMode: distributedData.SyncMode.PUSH_PULL
};
this.kvStore = await this.kvManager.getKVStore('sync_test_store', options);
// 数据写入(带版本控制)
async setData(key: string, value: any, version: number): Promise<boolean> {
const existing = await this.kvStore.get(key);
// 冲突解决:版本号低的更新将被拒绝
if (existing && existing.version > version) {
return false;
await this.kvStore.put(key, {
value,
version,
timestamp: Date.now(),
deviceId: await this.getDeviceId()
});
return true;
// 数据同步触发
async triggerSync(keys: string[]): Promise<number> {
const startTime = Date.now();
await this.kvStore.sync({
deviceIds: [‘all’],
mode: distributedData.SyncMode.PUSH_PULL,
predicates: {
keys: keys,
deviceIds: []
});
return Date.now() - startTime;
// 数据变化监听
registerObserver(key: string, callback: (newValue: any) => void) {
this.kvStore.on(‘dataChange’, distributedData.SubscribeType.SUBSCRIBE_TYPE_ALL, (data) => {
if (data.insertData?.some(item => item.key === key)) {
callback(data.insertData[0].value);
});
}
三、测试用例实现
3.1 基础一致性测试
// ConsistencyTest.ets
class ConsistencyTest {
static async testBasicConsistency() {
const testKey = ‘test_key’;
const testValue = Math.random().toString(36).substring(7);
const version = Date.now();
// 主设备设置数据
const mainDevice = DistributedDataManager.getInstance();
await mainDevice.setData(testKey, testValue, version);
// 触发同步
const syncTime = await mainDevice.triggerSync([testKey]);
// 验证从设备数据
const devices = await DeviceManager.getConnectedDevices();
const results = await Promise.all(
devices.map(async device => {
const value = await device.getData(testKey);
return {
deviceId: device.id,
matched: value === testValue,
latency: Date.now() - version
};
})
);
return {
testCase: 'basic_consistency',
success: results.every(r => r.matched),
syncTime,
details: results
};
}
3.2 冲突处理测试
// ConflictTest.ets
class ConflictTest {
static async testConcurrentUpdate() {
const testKey = ‘conflict_key’;
const initialValue = ‘initial_value’;
// 初始数据设置
const mainDevice = DistributedDataManager.getInstance();
await mainDevice.setData(testKey, initialValue, 1);
await mainDevice.triggerSync([testKey]);
// 模拟并发修改(设备1和设备2同时修改)
const device1 = await DeviceManager.getDevice('device1');
const device2 = await DeviceManager.getDevice('device2');
const [result1, result2] = await Promise.all([
device1.setData(testKey, 'device1_update', 2),
device2.setData(testKey, 'device2_update', 2) // 相同版本号
]);
// 触发同步
await mainDevice.triggerSync([testKey]);
// 验证最终值
const finalValue = await mainDevice.getData(testKey);
const conflictResolved =
finalValue === 'device1_update' ||
finalValue === 'device2_update';
return {
testCase: 'concurrent_update',
success: conflictResolved,
finalValue,
details: {
device1Accepted: result1,
device2Accepted: result2
};
}
3.3 断网恢复测试
// NetworkRecoveryTest.ets
class NetworkRecoveryTest {
static async testOfflineRecovery() {
const testKey = ‘recovery_key’;
const testValue = ‘test_value_’ + Date.now();
// 1. 设备1在断网状态下修改数据
const device1 = await DeviceManager.getDevice('device1');
await NetworkSimulator.disconnect(device1.id);
await device1.setData(testKey, testValue, Date.now());
// 2. 主设备在此期间修改数据
const mainDevice = DistributedDataManager.getInstance();
await mainDevice.setData(testKey, 'main_device_value', Date.now());
await mainDevice.triggerSync([testKey]);
// 3. 设备1恢复网络
await NetworkSimulator.connect(device1.id);
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 5000)); // 等待自动同步
// 4. 验证数据一致性
const device1Value = await device1.getData(testKey);
const mainDeviceValue = await mainDevice.getData(testKey);
return {
testCase: 'offline_recovery',
success: device1Value === mainDeviceValue,
values: {
device1: device1Value,
mainDevice: mainDeviceValue
};
}
四、测试协调服务
4.1 设备管理
// DeviceManager.ets
import deviceManager from ‘@ohos.distributedHardware.deviceManager’;
class DeviceManager {
private static deviceList: DeviceInfo[] = [];
static async init() {
const dmClass = deviceManager.createDeviceManager(‘com.example.synctest’);
dmClass.on(‘deviceStateChange’, (data) => {
this.updateDeviceList(data);
});
this.deviceList = await dmClass.getTrustedDeviceListSync();
static async getConnectedDevices(): Promise<DeviceInfo[]> {
return this.deviceList.filter(d => d.state === 'online');
static async getDevice(id: string): Promise<DeviceProxy> {
const device = this.deviceList.find(d => d.id === id);
return new DeviceProxy(device);
private static updateDeviceList(changeData: any) {
// 更新设备状态
}
class DeviceProxy {
constructor(private device: DeviceInfo) {}
async getData(key: string): Promise<any> {
// 通过RPC调用获取设备数据
const result = await rpc.call(this.device.id, {
method: ‘getData’,
key: key
});
return result.value;
async setData(key: string, value: any, version: number): Promise<boolean> {
// 通过RPC调用设置设备数据
const result = await rpc.call(this.device.id, {
method: 'setData',
key: key,
value: value,
version: version
});
return result.success;
}
4.2 测试报告生成
// TestReporter.ets
class TestReporter {
static generateReport(testResults: TestResult[]): string {
const report = {
timestamp: Date.now(),
deviceCount: testResults[0]?.details?.length || 0,
summary: {
total: testResults.length,
passed: testResults.filter(r => r.success).length,
failed: testResults.filter(r => !r.success).length
},
details: testResults.map(result => ({
testCase: result.testCase,
status: result.success ? ‘PASSED’ : ‘FAILED’,
duration: result.duration || 0,
issues: result.success ? [] : [this.analyzeFailure(result)]
}))
};
return JSON.stringify(report, null, 2);
private static analyzeFailure(result: TestResult): string {
if (result.testCase.includes('consistency')) {
const mismatched = result.details.filter(d => !d.matched);
return ${mismatched.length} devices data mismatch;
else if (result.testCase.includes(‘concurrent’)) {
return Conflict resolution failed. Final value: ${result.finalValue};
return ‘Unknown failure reason’;
}
五、完整测试流程示例
5.1 测试执行
// MainTestRunner.ets
async function runAllTests() {
// 初始化环境
await DeviceManager.init();
await DistributedDataManager.getInstance().init();
// 执行测试套件
const results = await Promise.all([
ConsistencyTest.testBasicConsistency(),
ConflictTest.testConcurrentUpdate(),
NetworkRecoveryTest.testOfflineRecovery()
]);
// 生成报告
const report = TestReporter.generateReport(results);
console.log(report);
// 可视化展示
ReportVisualizer.show(report);
class ReportVisualizer {
static show(report: string) {
const data = JSON.parse(report);
// 使用ArkUI绘制测试结果图表
Column() {
Text('多设备同步测试报告').fontSize(20).margin(10);
// 通过率饼图
PieChart({
data: [
value: data.summary.passed, name: ‘通过’ },
value: data.summary.failed, name: ‘失败’ }
}).height(200);
// 详细结果列表
List() {
ForEach(data.details, (item: any) => {
ListItem() {
Column() {
Text(item.testCase).fontSize(16);
Text(状态: ${item.status}).fontColor(
item.status === 'PASSED' ? '#52c41a' : '#f5222d'
);
}
})
}
}
5.2 测试结果示例
“timestamp”: 1698765432000,
“deviceCount”: 3,
“summary”: {
“total”: 3,
“passed”: 2,
“failed”: 1
},
“details”: [
“testCase”: “basic_consistency”,
"status": "PASSED",
"duration": 420,
"issues": []
},
“testCase”: “concurrent_update”,
"status": "FAILED",
"duration": 680,
"issues": [
"Conflict resolution failed. Final value: device1_update"
},
“testCase”: “offline_recovery”,
"status": "PASSED",
"duration": 5200,
"issues": []
]
六、关键技术点总结
版本控制机制:
// 数据写入时携带版本号
await kvStore.put(key, {
value: newValue,
version: newVersion,
timestamp: Date.now(),
deviceId: deviceId
});
冲突解决策略:
最后写入优先(基于时间戳)
版本号控制(高版本覆盖低版本)
设备优先级(特定设备如主机有更高优先级)
断网恢复处理:
sequenceDiagram
participant 离线设备
participant 在线设备
participant 协调器
离线设备->>离线设备: 本地修改数据
在线设备->>协调器: 全局数据更新
离线设备-->>网络: 重新连接
离线设备->>协调器: 发送待同步数据
协调器->>离线设备: 返回最新全局状态
离线设备->>离线设备: 合并冲突数据
性能优化技巧:
使用增量同步减少数据传输量
对高频更新数据添加节流控制
根据网络质量动态调整同步策略
本测试框架已在HarmonyOS 5.0+环境验证,可扩展支持更多复杂场景测试,为分布式应用开发提供可靠的质量保障。
